The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition

By Axel Honneth

During this quantity Axel Honneth deepens and develops his hugely influential concept of popularity, exhibiting the way it permits us either to reconsider the concept that of justice and to provide a compelling account of the connection among social replica and person identification formation.

Drawing on his reassessment of Hegel’s functional philosophy, Honneth argues that our perception of social justice may be redirected from a preoccupation with the foundations of allotting items to a spotlight at the measures for developing symmetrical family of popularity. This theoretical reorientation has far-reaching implications for the idea of justice, because it obliges this concept to interact at once with difficulties in regards to the association of labor and with the ideologies that stabilize family members of domination.

within the ultimate a part of this quantity Honneth exhibits how the speculation of popularity offers a fruitful and illuminating approach of exploring the relation among social replica and id formation. instead of seeing teams as regressive social types that threaten the autonomy of the person, Honneth argues that the ‘I’ relies on varieties of social reputation embodied in teams, due to the fact neither self-respect nor vainness might be maintained with out the supportive adventure of practicing shared values within the group.

this crucial new booklet via one of many prime social philosophers of our time may be of significant curiosity to scholars and students in philosophy, sociology, politics and the arts and social sciences typically.

Show description

Preview of The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition PDF

Similar Social Theory books

Information: A Very Short Introduction

We are living in a society that's awash with info, yet few folks fairly comprehend what details is. during this Very brief creation, one of many world's best professionals at the philosophy of knowledge and on details ethics, Luciano Floridi, bargains an illuminating exploration of data because it pertains to either philosophy and technological know-how.

Critical Theory: A Very Short Introduction

Serious conception emerged within the Twenties from the paintings of the Frankfurt university, the circle of German-Jewish lecturers who sought to diagnose-and, if in any respect attainable, cure-the ills of society, relatively fascism and capitalism. during this booklet, Stephen Eric Bronner presents sketches of top representatives of the serious culture (such as George Lukács and Ernst Bloch, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse and Jurgen Habermas) in addition to lots of its seminal texts and empirical investigations.

The Severed Head: Capital Visions (European Perspectives: A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism)

Educated by way of a provocative exhibition on the Louvre curated through the writer, The Severed Head unpacks inventive representations of severed heads from the Paleolithic interval to the current. Surveying work, sculptures, and drawings, Julia Kristeva turns her famed serious eye to a research of the pinnacle as image and metaphor, as spiritual item and actual truth, additional constructing a serious subject in her work--the energy of horror--and the opportunity of the face to supply an event of the sacred.

Handbook of Sociological Theory (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research)

This wide-ranging instruction manual offers in-depth discussions at the array of subspecialties that include the sphere of sociological thought. admired theorists operating in quite a few traditions talk about methodologies and methods; the cultural flip in sociological theorizing; interplay methods; theorizing from the systemic and macro point; new instructions in evolutionary theorizing; energy, clash, and alter; and theorizing from assumptions of rationality.

Additional resources for The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition

Show sample text content

In his reconstruction of the middle of our intuitions, Miller retains to the completely classical thought based on which ‘justice’ capability giving ‘to each one his or her personal’ (suum cuique). in response to this notion, each topic merits to be taken care of in a fashion that's applicable to his or her person houses. Justice for this reason calls for that instead of indiscriminately deal with humans both, we take their particularity under consideration and for this reason deal with them both or unequally. but when our intuitions approximately justice purely consisted during this one, critical suggestion, they'd be unfounded. we'd be aware of that we're purported to deal with others in line with their respective particularities, yet we'd now not have any shared criterion for sorting and comparing the complementary calls for. In Miller's view, we catch up on this uncertainty in our intuitive conceptions of justice via taking the kind of our dating with different people because the usual for judging which in their houses are appropriate for deciding upon what's simply. based on the character of the binds that bind us to our fellow voters, the calls for they're justified in making folks can switch. ‘To every one his or her personal’ could hence suggest treating every person in keeping with the normative tasks which are attribute for the kind of social courting that binds us jointly. back, those feedback are meant now not as descriptions of our factical ideals approximately justice, yet as reconstructions of our intuitive ideals approximately justice. With those symptoms in regards to the normative value of social relationships, Miller purely desires to declare that each useful member of our society intuitively varieties out questions of justice in accordance with the field of social existence to which she or he belongs. He as a result holds that all of us own one of those shared grammar, a ‘moral map’, that – at maturity on the most recent – is helping us to tell apart among diverse contexts of justice. yet for Miller, opposite to what's real in discourse ethics, those contexts point out no longer a variety of fields of program for one and a similar technique, yet in truth unique spheres of justice. 7 every one social sphere that he believes us in a position to intuitively distinguishing has its personal unique precept of justice. For the methodological target that Miller pursues by means of reconstructing our experience of justice, it really is nearly central that the differences we make intuitively and day-by-day among quite a few spheres primarily coincide with the differences that folks in truth make. with out the sort of imprecise, initial accident, Miller couldn't even are looking to grab those reconstructed conceptions of justice as normative justifications of well known perspectives on social justice. as a result, it truly is finally no longer dazzling that he additionally claims a differentiation of our intuitions of justice in 3 social spheres. On his account, the contributors of liberal-democratic societies intuitively separate their social global into 3 assorted contexts, which range in response to how slim or ethically saturated their particular relationships of interplay are.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.70 of 5 – based on 24 votes