A transdisciplinary reader on Luce Irigaray’s interpreting and rewriting of historical Greek texts.
In this definitive reader, renowned students give some thought to how Luce Irigaray reads the vintage discourse of Western metaphysics and in addition how she is learn inside of and in contrast discourse. Her go back to “the Greeks,” via options of deconstructing, demythifying, reconstructing, and remythifying, isn't really a nostalgic go back to the ideality of Hellenocentric antiquity, yet relatively an affirmatively serious revisiting of this ideality. Her continual go back and affective bond to old Greek trademarks, mythos, and tragedy sheds mild on a few of the main complicated epistemological matters in modern thought, equivalent to the workings of feedback, the language of politics and the politics of language, the potential of social and symbolic transformation, the a number of mediations among metropolitan and postcolonial contexts of thought and perform, the query of the opposite, and the functionality of the female in Western metaphysics. With a foreword through Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and a bankruptcy by means of Irigaray responding to her commentators, this booklet is an crucial textual content for these in social conception, comparative literature, or classics.
“This is not any doubt a state of the art edited assortment that allows you to make a big contribution now not basically to present Irigaray scholarship and to the fields of feminism, gender and queer reviews yet, extra extensively, in modern severe and cultural theory.” — Year’s paintings in severe and Cultural Theory
“The actual energy, and infrequent caliber, of this ebook lies in its willingness to interact in a nuanced—at occasions, even critical—approach to Irigaray’s feminism.” — New Formations
“This singular quantity starts off to take account of the large impression and diversity of the paintings of Luce Irigaray. Taking as some degree of departure the major severe writings on Greek philosophy that shape the foundation of Irigaray’s theories of sexual distinction, the sexed physique, and writing, this anthology brings Irigaray’s Greek legacy into the current to think about feminist philosophy as a severe rereading of philosophy’s foundations. Here we see that the departures from that vital culture are as vital because the accounts we owe. Once back we see that to learn Irigaray capacity studying to learn in either instructions at once. As good, we see in vibrant phrases that Irigaray’s paintings poses an huge, immense problem for rethinking kinfolk of eros and love, recrafting philosophy via new textual and corporeal practices, either embodied and critical. The quantity acknowledges Irigaray as a feminist thinker whose paintings has itself produced a magnificent legacy of various and very important feedback between significant modern thinkers. This is a useful textual content for these who desire to comprehend simply how significantly feminist proposal intervenes in questions of historical past, love, embodiment, and critical readings in philosophy.” — Judith Butler, writer of Frames of conflict: while Is lifestyles Grievable?
“This booklet will captivate feminist students and classicists alike, proposing the complicated landscape of an interdisciplinary learn within which the primacy of the ‘text’ (be it Irigaray’s or that of the traditional culture) is whilst proven and trespassed.” — Adriana Cavarero, writer of Stately our bodies: Literature, Philosophy, and the query of Gender
Preview of Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and 'the Greeks' (SUNY series in Gender Theory) PDF
Best Feminism books
It is a selection of speeches Andrea Dworkin made in the course of the 1970's anywhere she may get her model of feminism throughout in a principally patriarchal American society. As method of creation Dworkin tells of her struggles to be heard- particularly via different girls and the (mostly undesirable) reactions she obtained from her lectures.
Rae Langton right here attracts jointly her ground-breaking paintings on pornography and objectification. On pornography she argues from uncontroversial liberal premises to the debatable feminist conclusions that pornography subordinates and silences girls, and that girls have rights opposed to pornography. On objectification she starts off with the conventional concept that objectification contains treating somebody as a specific thing, yet then indicates that it really is via one of those self-fulfilling projection of ideals and perceptions of ladies as subordinate that ladies are made subordinate and handled as issues.
Author and filmmaker Laura Mulvey is generally considered as probably the most demanding and incisive modern feminist cultural theorists. a part of the Nineteen Seventies new release of British movie theorists and self sufficient filmmakers, she got here to prominence together with her vintage paintings at the pleasures, and displeasures, of narrative cinema, visible and different Pleasures.
“On the events of girls around the globe this day, this one booklet offers extra illumination and perception than a dozen others mixed. . . . Freedman’s survey is a triumph of worldwide scope and proficient precision. ”–NANCY F. COTT Professor of historical past, Harvard UniversityRepeatedly declared lifeless by means of the media, the women’s move hasn't ever been as vivid because it is this present day.
- Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women
- Things No One Will Tell Fat Girls: A Handbook for Unapologetic Living
- Hard to Get: Twenty-Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom
- Anti-Porn: The Resurgence of Anti-Pornography Feminism
- Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism (Theories of Representation and Difference)
Extra resources for Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and 'the Greeks' (SUNY series in Gender Theory)
Jean-Luc Nancy, “Myth Interrupted,” within the Inoperative neighborhood, ed. Peter Connor (Minneapolis: collage of Minnesota Press, 1991). eight. Ibid. , sixty nine. nine. Friedrich Nietzsche, The homosexual technological know-how, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random condo, 1974), Aphorism 341. 10. Friedrich Nietzsche, The transportable Nietzsche, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Penguin Books, 1976), 251. eleven. Elizabeth Grosz, “Becoming…An Introduction,” in Becomings: Explorations in Time, reminiscence, and Futures, ed. Elizabeth Grosz (Ithaca and London: Cornell college Press, 1999), five. 12. Butler, our bodies that subject, 224. thirteen. Michel Foucault, L’Ordre du discourse (Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1971), 28. 14. Michel Foucault, “What Is an writer? ” in Language, Counter-memory, perform: chosen Essays and Interviews through Michel Foucault, ed. Donald F. Bouchard (Ithaca: Cornell collage Press, 1977), a hundred thirty five. 15. Naomi Schor, “This Essentialism which isn't One,” in enticing with Irigaray, ed. Carolyn Burke, Naomi Schor, and Margaret Whitford (New York: Columbia collage Press, 1994), sixty seven. sixteen. Jacques Derrida, Margins of Philosophy (Chicago: collage of Chicago Press, 1982), nine. bankruptcy 2 The query of examining Irigaray Elizabeth Weed Irigaray is the main radical of feminist theorists and the main difﬁcult to learn. For symptoms of that difﬁculty, one desire purely examine different sorts of reception her paintings has bought during the last 3 a long time. In 1974, on the time of the book of Speculum, de l’autre femme, her doctoral dissertation in philosophy, Irigaray used to be a working towards analyst, a member of Lacan’s École freudienne de Paris, and one of many EFP contributors who provided classes in psychoanalysis on the college of Paris at Vincennes. numerous months after the e-book of the publication, she was once suspended from her instructing at Vincennes. bills as to why she used to be given the chilly shoulder by way of the Lacanian institution point out that a few thought of her booklet excessively philosophical and inappropriately political. 1 A decade later while Speculum used to be translated into English, besides a suite of essays, This intercourse which isn't One, the Anglo-American reaction was once of a distinct variety. Toril Moi stumbled on the paintings to be insufﬁciently philosophical—that is to assert insufﬁciently deconstructive—in its attempt to move past the critique of lady as man’s different to the formula of a good femininity. 2 For Jacqueline Rose, Irigaray’s challenge with the speciﬁcity of lady drives displayed a failure of psychoanalytic rigor. we all know from Lacan, Rose writes, that “there isn't any pre-discursive truth. and there's no female open air language. First, as the subconscious severs the topic from any unmediated relation to the physique as such . . . and secondly as the ‘feminine’ is constituted as a department in language, a situation that produces the female as its destructive time period. If the lady is deﬁned as different for the reason that the deﬁnition produces her as different, and never simply because she has one other essence. ”3 The Irigaray who's learn as no longer understanding this truth—the scandalously improper Irigaray—came to be the nodal aspect of next Anglo-American wars approximately essentialism.