Reconstructing Lenin: An Intellectual Biography

By Tamás Krausz

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin is one of the so much enigmatic and influential figures of the 20 th century. whereas his existence and paintings are an important to any realizing of recent background and the socialist circulation, generations of writers at the left and the appropriate have visible healthy to embalm him without end with superficial research or dreary dogma. Now, after the autumn of the Soviet Union and “actually-existing” socialism, it truly is attainable to contemplate Lenin afresh, with sober senses expert on his old context and the way it formed his theoretical and political contributions. Reconstructing Lenin, 4 many years within the making and now on hand in English for the 1st time, is an try and do exactly that.

Tamás Krausz, an esteemed Hungarian pupil writing within the culture of György Lukács, Ferenc Tokei, and István Mészáros, makes an important contribution to a transforming into box of up to date Lenin experiences. This wealthy and penetrating account finds Lenin busy on the paintings of revolution, his suggestion formed by means of quick political occasions yet by no means straying faraway from a coherent theoretical viewpoint. Krausz balances exact descriptions of Lenin’s time and position with lucid explications of his highbrow improvement, masking more than a few themes like battle and revolution, dictatorship and democracy, socialism and utopianism.Reconstructing Lenin will swap how you examine a guy and a circulate; it's going to additionally introduce the English-speaking global to a profound radical scholar.

Show description

Preview of Reconstructing Lenin: An Intellectual Biography PDF

Best Political Theory books

From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology

An creation to the paintings of the best German sociologist and a key determine within the improvement of present-day sociological concept.

Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government [Oxford Political Theory Series]

This is often the 1st full-length presentation of a republican replacement to the liberal and communitarian theories that experience ruled political philosophy lately. the newest addition to the acclaimed Oxford Political concept sequence, Pettit's eloquent and compelling account opens with an exam of the normal republican perception of freedom as non-domination, contrasting this with validated unfavourable and optimistic perspectives of liberty.

Traveling Back: Toward a Global Political Theory

We are living in a world age, an age of massive scale and velocity, an age of significant technological and monetary and environmental switch, in stipulations our ancestors may possibly hardly ever have imagined. What does this compression of geographical and temporal scale suggest for our political pondering? can we want new modes of political concept or a brand new form of political mind's eye?

Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (New Directions in Critical Theory)

Till lately, struggles for justice proceeded opposed to the historical past of a taken-for-granted body: the bounded territorial kingdom. With that "Westphalian" photograph of political house assumed through default, the scope of justice used to be infrequently topic to open dispute. this day, although, human-rights activists and overseas feminists subscribe to critics of structural adjustment and the area alternate association in hard the view that justice can in simple terms be a household relation between fellow voters.

Additional info for Reconstructing Lenin: An Intellectual Biography

Show sample text content

Seventy five The Philosophical history of the Political Debate Lenin most well liked to not conflate ideological debates with tactical disagreements. in reality, from a methodological viewpoint he expressly disapproved of this strategy. a few of his letters to Gorky in February–March 1908 are proof of this disapproval. On 25 November, he wrote: To prevent the appliance of the strategies of progressive social-democracy within the staff’ get together for the sake of disputes at the query of materialism or Machism, will be, for my part, unpardonable folly. We should struggle over philosophy in the sort of manner that Proletary and the Bolsheviks, as a faction of the celebration, wouldn't be plagued by it. seventy six Lenin felt pressured to learn many essays on such issues because the infighting one of the factions endured to develop sharper. It quickly compelled him to dedicate the very stupidity that he warned opposed to in his letter to Gorky. He formulated the pertinent philosophical thesis along with his accustomed readability: Marx can't be complemented with Kant, he argued, for Marx’s philosophical ideas don't have any Kantian “agnostic” roots. Lenin’s later flip towards Hegel in 1914 explains his stance in 1908, particularly that the Kantian supplement recommended within the Eighties used to be the very embodiment of a philosophical and theoretical revision of Marxism, from the Narodniks the entire approach to Bernstein. seventy seven Marx’s Hegelian assets got significance by utilizing the dialectical process, but the philosophical troublesome of dialectics remained the history to the controversy among Lenin’s “empirionism” at the one hand, and Lunacharsky and partners’ “religious atheism” at the different. It grew to become out that Plekhanov, and in this case Lenin, had mentioned the philosophical war of words with Bogdanov and his fans already in 1903–04. those disagreements have been made extra particular upon own come upon with Bogdanov. seventy eight through then the tactical and factional struggles in the occasion had develop into imbued with philosophical arguments. seventy nine Lenin believed he may well kill birds with one stone: he may shield the materialist philosophical place whereas wearing ahead, or no less than reinforcing, the political and ideological perspectives of his faction. He might expect the backing of Plekhanov during this venture, because it used to be an issue of protecting conventional “bourgeois materialism” within the face of Machism. eighty truly, the useful materialism we discover in Marx and Engels—which ties philosophy to innovative perform, reconciling dialectics with epistemological and ontological views, and which finally reworked philosophy into “theory” by way of linking it to the staff’ movement—could now not achieve significance within the debates round Machism. eighty one whatever else used to be at stake within the debate. so one can guard “bourgeois materialism” Lenin gave up his reservations concerning philosophical debates. In his empirio-criticism Lenin used to be mobilizing no longer a lot the Marxist philosophical culture, yet particularly that of Plekhanov, within which materialism is formulated inside a framework of monist mirrored image thought.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.68 of 5 – based on 48 votes