During this groundbreaking paintings, Ellen Meiksins wooden rewrites the historical past of political conception. She strains the improvement of the Western culture from classical antiquity via to the center a long time within the point of view of social history—a major departure not just from the normal summary background of principles but in addition from different contextual tools.
Treating canonical thinkers as passionately engaged humans, wooden examines their rules now not easily within the context of political languages yet as inventive responses to the social kin and conflicts in their time and position. She identifies a particular relation among estate and kingdom in Western heritage and exhibits how the canon, whereas mostly the paintings of participants or consumers of dominant sessions, used to be formed through complicated interactions between owners, labourers and states. Western political idea, wooden argues, owes a lot of its energy, and in addition many ambiguities, to those advanced and sometimes contradictory family.
From the traditional Greek polis of Plato, Aristotle, Aeschylus and Sophocles, throughout the Roman Republic of Cicero and the Empire of St Paul and St Augustine, to the medieval global of Averroes, Thomas Aquinas and William of Ockham, Citizens to Lords offers a wealthy, dynamic exploration of thinkers and ideas that experience indelibly stamped our sleek global.
Preview of Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages PDF
Similar Political Theory books
An advent to the paintings of the best German sociologist and a key determine within the improvement of present-day sociological suggestion.
This can be the 1st full-length presentation of a republican substitute to the liberal and communitarian theories that experience ruled political philosophy in recent times. the newest addition to the acclaimed Oxford Political thought sequence, Pettit's eloquent and compelling account opens with an exam of the conventional republican belief of freedom as non-domination, contrasting this with tested destructive and confident perspectives of liberty.
We are living in a world age, an age of tremendous scale and velocity, an age of significant technological and fiscal and environmental swap, in stipulations our ancestors may infrequently have imagined. What does this compression of geographical and temporal scale suggest for our political pondering? can we want new modes of political suggestion or a brand new type of political mind's eye?
Till lately, struggles for justice proceeded opposed to the historical past of a taken-for-granted body: the bounded territorial country. With that "Westphalian" photograph of political house assumed through default, the scope of justice used to be not often topic to open dispute. at the present time, even if, human-rights activists and foreign feminists subscribe to critics of structural adjustment and the area alternate association in tough the view that justice can merely be a household relation between fellow voters.
- Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics; Civil Disobedience; On Violence; Thoughts on Politics and Revolution
- The Social and Political Thought of Bertrand Russell: The Development of an Aristocratic Liberalism (Ideas in Context)
- The Sane Society
- Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
- Max Stirner (Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought)
Additional info for Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages
In either conception and perform, then, a particular dynamic of estate and sophistication kin, distinctive from the relatives among rulers and matters, used to be woven without delay into the material of Greek and Roman politics. those kin generated a particular array of useful difficulties and theoretical concerns, specially within the democratic polis. there have been, in fact, detailed difficulties of social order in a society, like Athens, that lacked an unequivocally dominant ruling stratum whose monetary strength and political supremacy have been coextensive and inseparable, a society the place financial and political hierarchies didn't coincide and political family have been much less among rulers and matters than between electorate. those political kinfolk have been performed out in assemblies and juries, in consistent debate, which demanded new rhetorical abilities and modes of argumentation. not anything will be taken without any consideration; and, now not unusually, this used to be a hugely litigious society, within which political discourse derived a lot of its technique and substance from criminal disputation, with all its predilection for hairsplitting controversy. Greek political theorists have been self-conscious concerning the specialty in their particular type of nation, and so they unavoidably explored the character of the polis and what exclusive it from others. They raised questions on the foundation and goal of the nation. Having successfully invented a brand new id, the civic identification of citizenship, they posed questions about the which means of citizenship, who should still get pleasure from political rights and even if any department among rulers and governed existed via nature. They faced the strain among the levelling id of citizenship and the hierarchical ideas of noble start or wealth. questions on legislations and the rule of thumb of legislations; concerning the distinction among political association according to violence or coercion and a civic neighborhood in response to deliberation or persuasion; approximately human nature and its suitability (or another way) for political existence – all of those questions have been thrown up by way of the typical realities of existence within the polis. within the absence of a ruling type whose moral criteria have been authorized via the full group as its governing rules, it used to be not attainable to imagine the eternity and inviolability of conventional norms. They have been unavoidably subjected to theoretical scrutiny and problem. Defenders of conventional hierarchies have been obliged to reply now not via repeating outdated proverbs or reciting epics of aristocratic hero-kings yet via developing theoretical arguments to fulfill theoretical demanding situations. Questions arose in regards to the foundation of ethical and political rules and what makes them binding. From an analogous political realities emerged the humanistic precept that ‘man is the degree of all things’, with the entire new questions that this precept entailed. So, for example, the Sophists (Greek philosophers and academics who should be mentioned within the subsequent bankruptcy) requested no matter if ethical and political rules exist by means of nature or only via customized – a query that may be replied in quite a few methods, a few congenial to democracy, others in aid of oligarchy; and while Plato expressed his competition to democracy, he couldn't depend upon invoking the gods or time-honoured customized yet used to be obliged to make his case via philosophic cause, to build a definition of justice and the great lifestyles that appeared to rule out democracy.