Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique

By Lisa H. Schwartzman

Questions in regards to the relevance and cost of assorted liberal techniques are on the middle of vital debates between feminist philosophers and social theorists. even if many feminists invoke thoughts resembling rights, equality, autonomy, and freedom in arguments for liberation, a few try and steer clear of them, noting that they could additionally make stronger and perpetuate oppressive social buildings.

In Challenging Liberalism Schwartzman explores the explanations why techniques akin to rights and equality can occasionally make stronger oppression. She argues that sure varieties of abstraction and individualism are principal to liberal method and that those supply upward thrust to a few difficulties. Drawing at the paintings of feminist ethical, political, and criminal theorists, she constructs an technique that employs those thoughts, whereas viewing them from inside of a critique of social kinfolk of power.

Show description

Quick preview of Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique PDF

Similar Political Theory books

From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology

An advent to the paintings of the best German sociologist and a key determine within the improvement of present-day sociological suggestion.

Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government [Oxford Political Theory Series]

This can be the 1st full-length presentation of a republican replacement to the liberal and communitarian theories that experience ruled political philosophy in recent times. the most recent addition to the acclaimed Oxford Political thought sequence, Pettit's eloquent and compelling account opens with an exam of the conventional republican belief of freedom as non-domination, contrasting this with verified damaging and confident perspectives of liberty.

Traveling Back: Toward a Global Political Theory

We are living in an international age, an age of sizeable scale and velocity, an age of serious technological and monetary and environmental swap, in stipulations our ancestors may possibly hardly ever have imagined. What does this compression of geographical and temporal scale suggest for our political considering? can we desire new modes of political inspiration or a brand new form of political mind's eye?

Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (New Directions in Critical Theory)

Till lately, struggles for justice proceeded opposed to the heritage of a taken-for-granted body: the bounded territorial country. With that "Westphalian" photograph of political house assumed via default, the scope of justice was once hardly ever topic to open dispute. at the present time, in spite of the fact that, human-rights activists and foreign feminists subscribe to critics of structural adjustment and the area exchange association in not easy the view that justice can in simple terms be a family relation between fellow voters.

Extra info for Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique

Show sample text content

In overlooking the importance of those constructions, liberal theorists might unwittingly import them into their theorizing and fail to accomplish the abstraction for which they target. during this bankruptcy, I seriously research Dworkin’s conception of distributional equality, which he calls “equality of resources,” and the idealized scenario 38 A Feminist Critique of Liberalism that he constructs to give an explanation for it. One very important initial query raised by means of Dworkin’s paintings, and by means of different summary political theories, is that of the way such an excellent can be interpreted and utilized within the context of present social buildings. even supposing Dworkin touches upon this query, the hyperlinks among the summary stipulations of the appropriate and the concrete realities of our personal society are usually not fullyyt transparent. in truth, a few, together with Will Kymlicka, have argued that the reforms that stick to from Dworkin’s idea are extra radical than those that he himself articulates: “Dworkin frequently writes as though the obvious or most likely results of imposing his notion of justice will be to extend the extent of move funds among occupants of latest social roles. . . . yet his thought includes a extra radical reform— specifically, a transformation within the means present roles are outlined. ”1 regardless of the indeterminacy of Dworkin’s thought, even if, there are common good points of his liberalism, in addition to particular positive aspects of his idea of distributional equality, that lead him to not advocate extra radical reforms, yet as a substitute to usually help the associations of the established order. additionally, those common gains supply upward thrust to difficulties inside Dworkin’s excellent ahead of the extra difficulties of program. After summarizing the details of Dworkin’s thought, I articulate 3 particular criticisms. First, in placing forth his thought, Dworkin depends upon heritage assumptions—about issues similar to the economic climate, social conditions, and political relations—that are neither made specific nor given justification by way of his concept. particularly, the hypothetical state of affairs he constructs calls for that people own wisdom that will be unavailable to them lower than the stipulations he describes. whereas this is often an objection to his specific perfect, and never to liberal conception in general, it does recommend that this can be very tricky to build summary beliefs with no embedding assumptions which are attribute of our personal society and that aren't unavoidably perfect. moment, Dworkin assumes that the particular inequalities in our society end result in most cases from varieties of components, loss of assets and absence of “natural endowment. ” therefore, he considers inequality to be basically a question of one’s own situations, no longer an issue of bigger structures of oppression, and he underestimates the function of hierarchical platforms of energy (such as race, type, and gender) in reinforcing and perpetuating inequalities. 3rd, Dworkin fails to handle vital questions on the inducement in the back of his excellent, the will to come back up with a thought that's delicate to person ambition yet insensitive to endowment or condition.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.75 of 5 – based on 48 votes